We have a phantom member of our family.
(not like this, although does anyone else find it creepy than this dead child is following people around in children’s entertainment?)
When we moved into our first house, one of the people who sold us the house was Kimberly something-or-other. We immediately started getting mail for Kimberly Ellinger – her first name, our last. Our best guess is that a mailer assumed she got married, or divorced, and changed her last name to the one that was now on the house.
That was 2003. For us, it was five residences in three states ago. During that time, no one named Kimberly Ellinger ever sent in a donation, mailed back a comment card, or bought something through the mail. Because she doesn’t exist. Never has.
But she apparently loves Land’s End catalogs. She clearly needs car insurance pretty badly. And she got her AARP card last week.
AARP is one of the biggest acquisition mailers in the United States with about 170 million pieces going out recruiting new member each and every year. Part of me felt a little bit good that even an organization like this can fall prey to something that costs non-profits each and every year: bad data.
You may think that the worst thing that bad data can do is run up your costs. Au contraire, mon petit fromage.*
In 2014, a man received a letter from OfficeMax that was addressed to his name, with the second line of the address reading “Daughter Killed In Car Crash.”
Yes, a year earlier, his daughter had in fact been killed in a car crash. As someone who has lost a daughter, I can tell you that this type of solicitation does not make me want to buy office products. It makes me want to find the person responsible and punch them until I run out of fist or they run out of face.
But there probably was no person responsible. A screw-up that large requires a faulty system to let that letter go through. And every snowflake in that avalanche pleads not guilty.
While not as drastic, bad data is costing you dearly. Here are some systems you can set up to make sure that you aren’t sending the next such letter (and, more mundanely, save on the costs of bad data, which include both costs of mailings and the opportunity costs of missed revenues):
- Enter every bad address – mail and email — in your database as a bounce as soon as you can. For the mail, this will save on postage; for email, it will help your emails not be seen as spam (and, even better, it will help your emails actually not be spam).
- Track back these bad addresses to their origin. If you get a bunch of your acquisition packages back, find out what list(s) the pieces came from. If it’s one or two, that’s life. If you are getting a bunch of return to senders back, you can ask for a refund from the list and/or not use that list again.
- Use change of address tools. For each mailing, you want to run NCOA to make sure mailings get where they are supposed to go (and to remove non-standard address two lines like the above horrific story). For emailings, an eCOA can help you find new addresses from those that you’ve lost touch with.
- Search your database for common swear and hate words. It may shock you but not everyone on the Internet is a mature, upstanding member of society. I have seen things in online databases in particular (which are usually user entered) that would make longshoreman blush. Most of these are attempts to see more adult versions of “Dear Mr. Poopyfacehead” in print that I would describe as adolescent except for my desire not to besmirch adolescents. However, some may put real people’s addresses on with these abhorrent names and woe be unto you if you mail them as such.
- Similarly, look for ZIP codes of 11111, 12345, 0, and the like, as well as popular phone numbers like 123-456-7890 or 111-111-1111 and emails like email@example.com (that’s how ingrained it is to put .com at the end of email addresses). Delete them.
- Once you’ve taken out the bad data, delete accounts that don’t have the bare minimum necessary for inclusion, which should likely be a physical address, a phone number, or an email address. I once saw a mailing addressed only to “Roy.” Nothing else. My guess is Roy wasn’t going to get it.
Finally, at a certain point, give up. If Kimberly Ellinger hasn’t answered your first 50 mailings, number 51 probably isn’t going to sway her. Also, when you do, do the industry a favor and mark them as “do not rent.” Since you are going to be going after the people who provide you with bad names, it’s best not to become one yourself.
* This may surprise you, but I don’t actually know French.